How to measure the social behavior of Fragile X mice

How to measure the social behavior of Fragile X mice

The treatment of Fragile X syndrome is limited to the symptoms. One of the factors currently holding back drug development is the difficulty of finding a reliable behavioral test for neurobiological studies.

Posted by

Gonny Smit

Published on

Fri 20 Feb. 2015

Fragile X syndrome (FXS), formerly known as mental retardation, is a common developmental disorder with a prevalence of 1 in 3600 to 4000 males and 1 in 4000 to 6000 females (www.fragilex.org). Besides the intellectual challenges, patients often show behavioral abnormalities, which in a large part of the male patients strongly resembles autism-like behavior. Unfortunately, treatment of FXS is limited to the symptoms – think of behavioral therapy or pharmaceuticals to treat attentional deficits, anxiety, and impulse control problems.

Finding a treatment

According to Celine de Esch and her colleagues at Erasmus MC (Rotterdam, The Netherlands), one of the factors currently holding back drug development is the difficulty of finding a reliable behavioral test for neurobiological studies and drug screening. Their recent paper in Neurobiology of Disease describes a good candidate: the Automated Tube Test (ATT).

Automated Tube Test

The ATT is an apparatus with two goal boxes connected by a tube. This tube is just big enough for one mouse to pass, so when two mice meet each other in the middle, one is forced to back down. The one that ends up in the other one’s start box is designated the winner. The location of the mice is monitored using infrared light beams. When a mouse is reluctant to leave the start box, an air puff is applied to motivate them. This way, human intervention is limited.

Mouse model

The Fmr1 knockout mouse is a model for FXS, exhibiting many hallmarks of the disease. It has been substantially validated in literature; however, behavioral phenotypes can vary greatly between labs. De Esch et al.’s experiment used the ATT and a thorough training and housing regimen to find that these FXS mice show a robust phenotype in the test.

Dominant FXS mice

After thorough habituation and training, De Esch tested FXS and wild-type (WT) mice together in the ATT.  At first, FXS mice turned out to be clear winners across the board, showing robust social dominance. However, this seemed to be strongly influenced by social experience: Prior to starting the ATT rounds, the mice were housed in pairs – each FXS mouse with a WT littermate – but when the housing was changed to couples with the same genetic background, mice from both genotypes won an equal proportion of the matches. The social dominance of FXS mice did appear to be intrinsic, because when housed individually, they again won significantly more matches than WT mice.

Partial rescue by mGluR5 manipulation

FXS is caused by a lack of the FMR protein, and in its absence, signaling of the small brain receptor protein mGluR5 goes into overdrive. This causes many of the neurological problems in FXS, so the researchers also investigated both genetic and pharmaceutical rescue strategies that targeted mGluR5. Both interventions of the mGluR5 signaling normalized the outcomes in the tube test; however, the change was not enough for a complete rescue of the social behavior.

Future translational studies

According to Celine de Esch and her colleagues, the ATT is a robust and reliable behavioral test for this FXS mouse model. The limiting of human intervention compared to the manual version of this test has distinct advantages, such as a high level of precision. Additionally, the robustness of the behavioral phenotype of the Fmr1 KO model in this test shows promise for future translational studies.








RESOURCES: Read more about ErasmusLadder

Find out how ErasmusLadder is used in a wide range of studies and how it can elevate your research!

  • Free white papers and case studies
  • Customer success stories
  • Recent blog posts

Reference

Esch, C.E.F. de; Berg, W.E. van den; Buijsen, R.A.M.; Jaafar, I.A.; Nieuwenhuizen-Bakker, I.M.; Gasparini, F.; Kushner, S.A.; Willemsen, R. (2015). Fragile X mice have robust mGluR5-dependent alterations of social behavior in the Automated Tube Test. Neurobiology of Disease, 75, 31-39.

Related Posts

The relationship between social hierarchy and social stress
14 Oct animal behavior research Social Behavior

The relationship between social hierarchy and social stress

Today, Deepika Patel kindly shares her research on social structures with us. She investigated rat behavior in detail, using several test paradigms.
A high-throughput method to screen natural behavior of mice
13 Nov animal behavior research Social Behavior

A high-throughput method to screen natural behavior of mice

Traditional standard tests with rats or mice are carried out immediately after human interference. Therefore, the behavior of the animals may not be natural and spontaneous.
Did you know you can (semi) socially house tethered animals?
02 May animal behavior research Social Behavior

Did you know you can (semi) socially house tethered animals?

Socially housing tethered animals can be challenging, but also crucially beneficial to your study. Read more about how with our PhenoTyper we can solve that dilemma!